Format guide · Updated October 2026

Critical Thinking Tests: The Five Skills, Each With an Example

Critical thinking tests judge how well you weigh evidence and arguments. Here is each of the five commonly described skills with a short original item.

The short answer

Critical thinking tests in the Watson-Glaser tradition are usually described through five skills: drawing inferences, recognising assumptions, deducing, interpreting evidence and evaluating arguments. Versions and sub-scores differ by publisher and edition, so treat the five parts as a learning framework and check the publisher's own guide for your test.

How to use this guide

The five parts below are presented as small, self-contained exercises. The examples are original and were written for practice, not copied from any publisher's items. Some current editions group the skills into fewer reported scores, and the answer scales differ, so use these to learn the thinking rather than to predict exact test wording. For the named test itself, see the Watson-Glaser test page.

Part 1: Inference

An inference is a conclusion you draw from facts. Many versions rate a proposed inference from true to false on a scale that includes "insufficient data", which works like Cannot say.

A school opened a free breakfast club in September. By December, its records showed 30% fewer late arrivals than in the same months a year earlier.
Proposed inference: "The breakfast club caused the fall in late arrivals."
  • True
  • Probably true
  • Insufficient data
  • Probably false
  • False
Answer: Insufficient data
The passage gives a timing link but no evidence for cause. Weather, a new bus route or a change in how lateness is recorded could each explain the drop. By contrast, "there were fewer late arrivals than a year before" would be True, because the passage states it. Note that "Probably true" is a tempting middle answer, but a fair reading is that the data neither supports nor rules out the cause.

Part 2: Recognising assumptions

An assumption is something an argument takes for granted without stating. You are asked whether the argument relies on it.

"We should hire another receptionist, because waiting times at the clinic keep getting longer."
Is this assumption made? "Reception staffing is one of the things that affects waiting times."
  • Assumption made
  • Assumption not made
Answer: Assumption made
Without that link the conclusion has no connection to the reason. Compare "Every patient dislikes waiting." The argument does not need that to work, since it is enough that waiting is a problem for the clinic, so that assumption would not be required. A helpful test is: if the assumption were false, would the argument collapse?

Part 3: Deduction

Deduction asks whether a conclusion necessarily follows from statements you must treat as true.

No trainee has access to the archive. Everyone with a gold badge has access to the archive.
Conclusion: "No trainee has a gold badge." Does it follow?
  • Conclusion follows
  • Conclusion does not follow
Answer: Conclusion follows
A trainee with a gold badge would have archive access, which the first statement forbids. So no trainee can hold a gold badge. (This was checked by testing every possible arrangement of three people across the groups.) The reverse conclusion, "everyone without access is a trainee", would not follow, because other people may lack access too.

Part 4: Interpretation

Interpretation asks whether a conclusion follows beyond reasonable doubt from the data, taking the information as given.

Of the 40 delegates at a conference, 30 chose the vegetarian lunch.
Conclusion: "More than half of the delegates chose vegetarian." Does it follow?
  • Conclusion follows
  • Conclusion does not follow
Answer: Conclusion follows
30 out of 40 is 75%, which is clearly above half. Compare the conclusion "most of the people in the city eat vegetarian lunches". That does not follow, because 40 conference delegates are a narrow group and not a sample of the city.

Part 5: Evaluating arguments

Here you judge whether an argument is strong or weak. Strong means it is both important and directly linked to the question. A weak argument is trivial, off-topic or based on personal preference.

Should the city ban private cars from the centre?
Argument: "Yes, because air pollution in the centre regularly exceeds health guidelines."
  • Strong argument
  • Weak argument
Answer: Strong argument
The reason is directly related to the proposal and concerns a significant matter, public health. Compare "No, because some residents enjoy driving", which relates to the question but is a matter of preference, so it is weak.

A practice routine

1
Do one part at a time
Practise each skill separately until the question types feel routine.
2
Take the statements as given
Critical thinking items usually ask you to ignore outside facts that conflict with the text.
3
Write the test you used
For assumptions, "would the argument collapse?". For deduction, "can I build a counter-example?".
4
Review near-misses
Notice whether you tend to over-accept plausible conclusions or reject sound ones.

Practising with ReasonEra

Several of these parts overlap with verbal and logical reasoning, so those are the question types ReasonEra helps with. Upload a screenshot of a practice item, choose "Tutor Explanation", and read the reasoning for each option, not only the final answer. Free practice tests for verbal and logical reasoning are available, and a free account includes 3 trials. The 14-Day Pass costs 49 € for unlimited use for 14 days.

Practise on ReasonEra

Read your invitation first

This tool is meant for the weeks before an assessment, but conditions for a real test are set by the employer and are often strict, so read your invitation and keep ReasonEra for preparation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does a critical thinking test measure?

It measures how well you draw conclusions, notice hidden assumptions and judge the strength of arguments from written information. The exact skills reported depend on the publisher and the edition.

What are the five parts of the Watson-Glaser test?

They are commonly described as inference, recognition of assumptions, deduction, interpretation and evaluation of arguments. Some editions group these into fewer scores, so check the publisher's guide.

How is critical thinking different from verbal reasoning?

Verbal reasoning usually asks whether statements are supported by a passage, while critical thinking also asks you to examine assumptions and argument quality. The two overlap in practice.

What is an assumption in a critical thinking test?

It is an unstated idea that an argument depends on to work. If the argument would fall apart without it, it counts as an assumption made.

How can I prepare for a critical thinking test?

Practise each part separately, learn to build counter-examples and review every wrong answer. ReasonEra's explained answers and free verbal and logical practice tests can support this.

Related guides

A clearer route from question to answer

Each explanation names the rule that was used, so you can apply it to the next question yourself.

Payment goes through Paddle. The Refund & Cancellation Policy explains what happens if you change your mind.

Notes. This guide is based on general practice and public information, so confirm specifics with the recruiter. We fix mistakes quickly when they are sent to info@reasonera.com.